We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect
For Programme Directors with a gateway review in the next 90 days
Your documentation assessed against the same criteria your reviewers will use. Every gap, every contradiction, every weak response — with page numbers. 48 hours.
Five gaps or it's free.
Risk register identifies 12 critical risks but the business case only addresses 4.
14 findings across 23 formal assessment criteria. A real Assay analysis.
That's the question. The one that surfaces at 2am, three weeks before the review.
Gateway reviews are formal. The criteria are published. The reviewer's checklist is structured. Every gate has specific assessment questions — and your documentation either answers them or it doesn't.
You know nobody has systematically assessed 40 documents against 23 gate-specific criteria. Not just for contradictions — for gaps where criteria aren't addressed at all. For claims made without supporting evidence. For responses that tick a box without actually demonstrating compliance.
A prep consultant costs $15,000–$30,000 and takes 3–5 weeks. And here's the thing nobody mentions: consultants structurally cannot offer this service for less. Their cost structure makes a $1,500 readiness analysis impossible. Not undesirable. Impossible.
So you do what 60–70% of projects do: prepare internally, fix what you can see, and hope.
That hope just became unnecessary.
Drag and drop your documentation suite. Select your gate and jurisdiction framework.
Every page assessed against your jurisdiction's formal gateway criteria — the same questions your reviewers will ask. Three independent AI models must agree before any finding is reported.
RAG-rated findings with page-level citations. Priority Five action list. SRO executive brief.
Each finding maps to a specific criterion from your jurisdiction's assurance framework. Gaps, contradictions, missing evidence, weak responses — all traced to exact pages. Three AI models verify.
3
Red
7
Amber
4
Green
14
Total
Risk register identifies 12 critical risks but the business case only addresses 4.
Benefits realisation plan references milestones not present in the project schedule.
Stakeholder engagement plan dated 14 months ago with no evidence of update.
Findings dashboard from an actual Assay analysis. Every finding has page-level citations you can verify in 30 seconds.
Gaps, contradictions, missing evidence, and weak responses — mapped to every criterion in your framework.
Red, Amber, or Green for every criterion on the reviewer's checklist.
Five highest-severity, most-fixable issues. Your action list.
Criterion → document → page → paragraph. Verify in 30 seconds.
One page your Senior Responsible Owner reads in three minutes.
Upload today. Findings by day after tomorrow.
"I keep wondering what they're going to find. That was the thought I lived with for three weeks before every gateway review. Then I ran Assay. 14 findings, three Red, all with page numbers I could verify. I fixed the Red items. The thought went away."
Programme Director, QLD Government Infrastructure
"Risk register page 34, business case page 112. I'd read both documents multiple times. Never caught the contradiction. That one finding alone was worth the $1,500."
PMO Lead, State Transport Programme
"I now suggest all my clients run Assay before I arrive. Better-prepared documentation means better reviews for everyone."
Lead Assessor, Accredited Review Panel
Real results from managed assessments. Names anonymised, findings verified.
47 documents. 14 findings. 3 Red items fixed before review. Achieved Green rating.
Read case study →32 documents. 9 findings. Gaps and contradictions resolved in 5 days.
Read case study →58 documents. 21 findings. SRO briefed with confidence. No surprises at review.
Read case study →Correct. And Assay doesn't try to. Assay assesses your documentation against the formal criteria from your jurisdiction's assurance framework — finding gaps, contradictions, missing evidence, and weak responses with page-level citations. The nuance is your judgment. We assess documents. Assessors assess teams.
It is — compared to consultants. But their cost structure requires $2–5K/day. AI doesn't bill by the hour. You're getting more analysis — every page instead of a sample — at a fraction of the cost.
$1,500 is below delegated authority thresholds in most Australian government departments. Purchase order or credit card. No panel, no RFQ.
They will assess your documentation against the formal criteria. They will find the gaps, the contradictions, the missing evidence.
The only variable is whether you see those findings first.
$1,500
Per assessment. 48-hour delivery.
Five gaps or it's free.
Have you Assayed your documentation?